[These questions were asked to me by an NGO about Indo-US nuclear deal –GAK]
1. Why
Energy security acts as a catalyst to all-round development. China does not want India to become regional superpower.
2. Left and BJP are opposing the deal. What are the main differences between their opposition? (OR what are the different positions in
Indian Left cannot think beyond
But what about BJP? The seeds of Indo-US strategic-cooperation were sowed during Vajpayee's premiership. Now, confused BJP is not making correct assessments. It wants to score political points.
3. How could the differences between Congress, Left and BJP could be bridged regarding 123 aggreement?
This is an impossible task.
4. If we scrap the deal, how should we deal with
Current isolation of
5. If we go ahead with the 123 aggreement - how should we approach the problem of engaging US?
123 agreement has a limited scope. It has many safety valves. Engaging US is important. It should not be altered with 123 agreement in force. Nuclear testing involves many risks even without the deal. For its own interests
I'm not aware of any secret clauses of the agreement. In a limited scope, the deal should be of help. But this should not be coupled with broader strategic issues. Those issues should be addressed seperately by India and the United States.
No comments:
Post a Comment